A bit of a rant!
JK Rowling Writes an Adult Novel? I know! Surprised me, too! But, then again, she's such a good author, I'd probably read anything she published. I understand her need to break away from Harry Potter and start something new; something fresh. To be completely honest, I feel kind of proud.
I still maintain that the last 3 books of the Harry Potter series were not children’s books. J.K herself said that a person should not be any younger than Harry is in the books when they read them. It always bugs me when I see them in the children’s section. Those and Phillip Pullman’s Dark Materials. When are people going to realize that just because the main characters are children doesn’t mean the books are for children.
And thanks to that comment, here’s a brief rant on something that irritates me.
What
makes a children’s book a children’s book? So many people classify books with
children as the protagonists as children’s books. But this is not the case!
Think about it!! Was Harry Potter a
children’s book? No! It was a young adult book at the very least! It’s dark! So
dark! Lord Voldemort murders Harry’s parents when he’s an infant, and tries to
kill Harry for 7 YEARS! He’s 11 when he first battles Voldemort. Eleven!
There’s something about that fact that makes me hesitant to consider that as
children’s literature. He watches people he loves die and or suffer. He’s told
he’s the only one who can destroy an all-powerful dark lord at a young age.
Yeah, it’s fantasy-fiction, but that’s a dark world for a child to be exposed to. I’m not sure that it’s an appropriate book
for a 4 year old.
I started Harry Potter
just after 1st grade, so I was about 6 or 7 at the time. And maybe
that’s a decent age to start. But, there were a lot of things I didn’t
understand. Granted, JK Rowling writes for all ages, and with some experience I
understood everything. But, I think about things like His Dark Materials and how Lyra’s only 11 as well. That series
couldn’t ever be a children’s series! When the Magesterium kidnaps children,
Lyra’s best friend gets taken. When she goes to look for him she finds out <they
kill children’s daemons to “save” them, which pretty much destroys the
children>. Not only that, but <Mrs. Coulter is in charge of the
operation and Lyra's mother>. I dunno, there’s something about these books that just doesn’t
make them child friendly. It’s like when I read The Shining in 7th or 8th grade. Another one! Danny is only 7 or 8, if I remember correctly! Here’s a
note for those who thought the movie was scary: it’s not even close to the
scariness that the book is. I’m serious. I couldn’t sleep for at least a week
after reading the book. When I saw the movie? Completely unfazed. Yeah, Jack
Nicholson’s creepy and a great actor, but nah. Didn’t get me as much as the
book did. I mean, seriously, <the entire book, you have no idea he’s going
crazy>.
Would one consider Grimm’s Fairytales to be children’s
literature? No! Of course not! It used to be, but at the same time, it was
ageless. The original fairytales we carry so near and dear to our hearts,
thanks to Disney, are so much darker and bloodier than we know them to be! I’ve
read so many things that are considered to be “children’s” literature, and it’s
a shame to see what fantastic work gets shunted to the sections where their
demographic will never look for them. It’s rather depressing! Just because the
main character of a book is a child does not
mean the book is a children’s book! Pick it up! Give it a try! Take The House of the Scorpion for example!
Matt is a genetic clone. He is
treated like crap. He’s locked away until El Patron has a use for him. Eejits are worked like mindless zombies.
It’s a terrible world and not one built for a children’s novel.
If you haven’t read my post about The House of the Scorpion, click here!
There is a theory that due to the Internet and text-messaging and all those shenanigans, that children are now unable to separate from their parents. The whole "being hounded by mum and dad" idea, I suppose. Maybe it doesn't matter anymore? Maybe we're all just really big children because of all this new technology. I somehow can't imagine that. The children in these books grow up so quickly, and we're being restricted somehow. And, yeah, a lot of us "teens" or "young adults" are just really big kids. But, that doesn't mean we can't reach that individuality that so many characters do. Would anyone's character develop if mum and dad held our hands all the way through adolescence? Probably not! I'm just thinking of Buster from Arrested Development. I think, in this society, we can't consider ourselves children. Thanks to technology, we grow up much faster than before. Yes, mum and dad are just a text or phone call away; but, you're still more-or-less on your own. But, a child is still a child. Becoming an adult, in my opinion, is not stripping oneself entirely of that childishness. I believe that you have to understand it, embrace it, and indulge it. Everyone is childlike. Everyone can identify with a child.
Don’t let age brackets deter you! Row! Row! Fight the power,
and grab yourself a good ol’ “children’s” book and see what it’s like. You
decide!
Happy Reading!
-- Isabel